Showing posts with label Iraq. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iraq. Show all posts

14 February 2015

Islamic State tries to attack base where hundreds of US troops are stationed

map

Iraqi army soldiers, a squad of Islamic State militants attempted to bomb a base in western Iraq where hundreds of United States troops are stationed, raising concerns about whether the Americans will be drawn into direct combat with the extremists.

Iraqi security forces supported by "surveillance assets" from the US-led coalition against the Islamic State killed eight militants who tried to carry out a "direct attack" on the Ayn al-Asad air base in Iraq's Anbar province at 7:20am, the Combined Joint Task Force said in a statement. The men were would-be suicide bombers who sought to enter the base disguised as Iraqi army soldiers, said Sulaiman al-Kubaisi, a spokesman for Anbar's provincial council.

Three of the militants reportedly were able to set off their explosives, before the rest were killed.

The attack came a day after militants took control of most of al-Baghdadi, a town less than seven kilometres from the base, where 320 US service members have been training Iraqi troops and tribal fighters.

US forces were "several kilometres" from the attack and were at no stage under direct threat, the statement said. Still, the targeting of a base hosting US troops underscored the risk that Americans could be drawn into real engagement with the militants.

President Barack Obama has made a formal request for congressional authority to use military force against the Islamic State, a move that critics argue could increase that risk.

The Islamic State has used similar tactics in the past. Iraqi troops welcomed militants disguised in army uniforms onto another base in Anbar province in September, in an attack that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of soldiers.

"We readily admit that al-Anbar is a contested region," Admiral Kirby said earlier Friday in an interview on CNN. "But . . . this is a huge, sprawling base, roughly the size of Boulder, Colorado," and it has "mini-bases inside the big base."

Admiral Kirby said of the US trainers and advisers, "there's no question that they're close to danger." Even though they do not have a ground combat mission, "they have the right to defend themselves," he said. "And should they ever feel under threat, they certainly have the right, the responsibility, the obligation to shoot back."

According to a statement from Anbar's provincial council, about 1000 Islamic State fighters launched Thursday's attack on al-Baghdadi, a strategic location due to its proximity to the Ayn al-Asad base. Major buildings in the town, including the police station and local council building, are in militant hands, according to tribal fighters and local officials.

The capture of al-Baghdadi, which remained under militant control Friday, demonstrates the continued ability of the Islamic State to stay on the attack despite coalition airstrikes and talk of a looming counteroffensive on major cities held by the group, which is also known as ISIS, ISIL and, in Arabic, Daesh. US officials maintain that the militants are largely on the defensive.

"Baghdadi is now under Daesh control," said Raad al-Timimi, a Defence Ministry spokesman, adding that urgent weapons supplies were being sent to the town.

The United States military said its ground forces were not involved in the fighting in Baghdadi but that Anbar remains under "severe threat" by Islamic State fighters. In December, the Pentagon denied local news reports that US forces were involved in direct combat with Islamic State fighters near the base.

While not tasked with combat, US trainers in Iraq are authorised to use force in self-defence. The Authorisation for the Use of Military Force, requested by Mr Obama on Wednesday, would leave flexibility for Special Operations forces to assist local forces, the president said.

11 February 2015

Obama seeks some limits on ground troops for Islamic State fight

Militant Islamist fighters hold the flag of Islamic State
Militant Islamist fighters hold the flag of Islamic State while taking part in a military parade along the streets of northern Raqqa province, June 30, 2014.
Credit: Reuters/Stringer

(Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama will propose to Congress on Wednesday a new three-year authorization for the use of force against Islamic State with limits on U.S. combat troops' involvement, lawmakers and congressional aides said.
Obama has defended his authority to lead an international coalition against Islamic State since Aug. 8 when U.S. fighter jets began attacking the jihadists in Iraq. But he has faced criticism for failing to seek the backing of Congress, where some accuse him of breaching his constitutional authority.
Facing pressure to let lawmakers weigh in on an issue as important as the deployment of troops and chastened by elections that handed power in Congress to Republicans, he said in November he would request formal authorization for the use of military force (AUMF).
An outline of that request, expected to be handed to Congress on Wednesday, could stir debate over how U.S. troops should be deployed and the extent of U.S. engagement in Iraq and Syria.
The proposal would allow the use of special forces and advisors for defensive purposes but bar "enduring offensive ground forces," lawmakers and aides said. It would not, however, set geographic limits for the campaign against the group.
Until now, Obama has justified U.S. air strikes in Iraq and Syria under a 2001 authorization passed after the Sept. 11 attacks and a 2002 authorization used by President George W. Bush in the Iraq war.
The new proposal would repeal the 2002 authorization but leave in place the 2001 AUMF, which has been invoked by the White House to carry out drone and missile strikes against suspected al Qaeda militants in Yemen and Somalia.


Fueled by outrage over the death of aid worker Kayla Mueller, the last-known U.S. hostage held by Islamic State militants, as well as the slayings of journalists and a Jordanian pilot, lawmakers said they planned quick hearings on the authorization, and a vote within weeks of Congress' return from a Feb. 16-20 recess.
Both Republicans and Democrats said there had been unusually close consultations between the administration and Capitol Hill on the authorization.
Many of Obama's fellow Democrats, war-weary after more than a dozen years of fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, say they will oppose any AUMF that includes "boots on the ground."
Obama's opposition to the Iraq War helped propel him to victory in the 2008 campaign and bringing troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan has been a focus of his presidency.
"I worry that this AUMF gives the ability for the next president to put ground troops back into the Middle East," said Senator Chris Murphy, adding that that would be a sticking point for himself and many other Democrats.
Some hawkish Republicans oppose restrictions on military commanders such as a ban on ground troops. Others are calling for a more extensive authorization allowing U.S. forces to challenge President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, where a four-year-long civil war has fueled the rise of the Islamic State group.
"If the authorization doesn't let us counter Assad's air power, I think it will fail," said Senator Lindsey Graham, a leading Republican foreign policy voice.
The White House has declined to discuss the specific time frame or details of its planned AUMF.
(Additional reporting by Roberta Rampton, David Lawder and Susan Cornwell; Editing by Jason Szep and Christian Plumb)

Original post found here: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/11/us-mideast-crisis-congress-idUSKBN0LE2BD20150211

06 February 2015

Islamic State in Syria seen under strain but far from collapse

Fighters of the Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG) patrol in the streets of the northern Syrian town of Kobani January 28, 2015. REUTERS/Osman Orsal
Fighters of the Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG) patrol in the streets of the northern Syrian town of Kobani January 28, 2015.
Credit: Reuters/Osman Orsal

(Reuters) - Islamic State's defeat in Kobani and other recent setbacks in Syria suggest the group is under strain but far from collapse in the Syrian half of its self-declared caliphate.
Islamic State's high-profile defeat by Kurdish militia backed by U.S.-led air strikes capped a four-month battle that cost Islamic State 2,000 of its fighters, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which tracks the war.